In the past few weeks we watched two videos about different photographers,
Annie Leibovitz and
James Nachtwey, and the way they go about their work. This week's task was to write a comparative essay on the two and to analyze their techniques and extrapolate them into our own visual anthropology setting.
John Lennon and Yoko Ono Rolling Stone cover
Photo by Annie Leibovitz
Both Annie Leibovitz and James Nacthwey are photographers who work for clients in magazine companies (
Rolling Stone and
Time respectively). They are described by their friends and coworkers as single-minded and unique. Above all, both photographers say that an important part of photography and taking good photos is to make sure you become a part of the scene. The opening line to James Nachtwey’s video is a quote from Robert Capa ‘if your pictures aren’t good enough, you’re not close enough’, which easily expresses how Annie and James work. In this case, the word ‘close’ doesn’t just refer to proximity, but also the closeness of the relationship between the photographer and the subject. Bestor (2003) describes this technique as ‘participant observation’. The best photos are taken when the subjects are comfortable with you being around them and taking their photo, so it is important to interact with the people and become a part of whatever it is you are photographing.
With regards to ‘participant observation’, Liebovitz and James Nachtwey have very different approaches. As Annie Leibovitz is a glamorous celebrity photographer and James Nachtwey is a war photographer, these two very different genres prove for very different subject participatory methods. Annie Leibovitz is constantly in the scene of the action, interacting with the subjects and giving her opinion on how best to portray the scene she has been commissioned to take. She is often friends with the subjects, or at least has some sort of prior relationship with them, and will get the subjects to pose in different positions in order to achieve a desirable feeling or emotion in the photo. In this way she is a ‘participant observer’ (Bestor 2003). Some opinions on this style of photography can be found at
Now With 50% More Pictures and at
Soramame Nikki in Japan.
Whoopi Goldberg posed in a milk bath - the intention being 'a black woman emerging from a world of white' (Life Through a Lens)
Photo taken by Annie Leibovitz
James Nachtwey, while not the complete opposite, approaches his photography in a different manner. While he is certainly amidst the action in the country at war - among the civilians who are shooting and being shot at, he takes a more observational rather than participatory stance and takes photos without interrupting the scene. He doesn't interact with the subjects in the way that Annie does because most everyone is a stranger to him, and he certainly doesn’t get them to pose in unnatural positions. In order to capture the reality of the situation, James Nachtwey passively takes his photos unobtrusively while asking questions if given the opportunity. This technique of becoming part of the scene where becoming a ‘real participant’ is not applicable is described by Bestor (2003) as ‘inquisitive observation’. More opinions can be found at
Nippin' for a Cuppa in Nippon and at
Kanpai Gaidai.
Ruins at Kosovo
Photo taken by James Nachtwey
Another difference between these two photographers is their intent behind taking the photos. Both photographers are commissioned by magazines and so ultimately they are working for profit. Both also want to express a reality. The difference lies here within the reality of which they want to capture. In Annie Leibovitz's case she wants to capture a created reality of the celebrities so that the readers of the magazine may be entertained. In James Nachtwey's case he wants to express the grim reality of war and poverty so that the readers of the magazine may have access to a different perspective. Both photographers want to provoke their viewers with the photos they take, but while Annie Leibovitz wants this in order to entertain, James Nachtwey wants this in order to educate.
JapAnthroLog also discusses this concept.
A family living in poverty who James Nachtwey followed for a time to find out how they live.
Photo taken by James Nachtwey
While celebrity photography and war photography are a far cry from what we as students are doing as visual anthropologists in Japan, there are useful techniques which both Annie and James use in order to take good photographs which we can also utilize. The most important technique would be making sure to interact with the subjects and to become a part of the scene; to ‘build rapport’ (Barbash and Taylor 1997). If the subjects feel comfortable around the photographer and their camera then they will be more likely to let their guard down and be relaxed. In return, the photographer is then able to take a more natural photograph without the subject feeling as if they need to put on a face for the camera, or, as suggested by Barbash and Taylor (1997), feel as if they should make a conscious effort to ignore the camera, thus bringing about a setting which still ends up far from the original reality.